s="" group="" that="" had="" invited="" men="" to="" join="" them.="" throughout="" the="" evening="" one="" man="" been="" particularly="" talkative="" frequently="" offering="" ideas="" and="" anecdotes="" while="" his="" wife="" sat="" silently="" beside="" him="" on="" couch.="" toward="" end="" of="" i="" commented="" women="" complain="" their="" husbands="" don’t="" talk="" this="" quickly="" concurred.="" he="" gestured="" sa "she's="" talker="" in="" our="" family.="" room="" burst="" into="" laughter="" looked="" puzzled="" hurt,="" "it's="" true"="" explained.="" “when="" come="" home="" from="" work="" have="" nothing="" say.="" if="" she="" didn't="" keep="" conversation="" going="" we'd="" spend="" whole="" silence.” This episode crystallizes the irony that although American men tend to talk more than women in public situations they often talk less at home, and pattern is wreaking havoc with marriage. The pattern was observed by political scientist Andrew Hacker in the late 70s. Sociologist Catherine Kohler Riessman reports in her new book Divorce Talk’’ at most of the women she interviewed— but only a few of the me— gave lack of communication as the reason for their divorces. Given the current divorce rate of nearly 50 percent that amounts to millions of cases in the United States every year —a virtual epidemic of failed conversation. In my own research complaints from women about their husbands most often focused not on tangible inequities such as having given up the chance for a career to accompany a husband to his or doing far more than their share of daily life-support work like cleaning cooking social arrangements and errands. Instead they focused on communication. “He doesn't listen to me”. “He doesn't talk to me.” I found as Hacker observed years before that most wives want their husbands to be first and foremost conversational partners but few husbands share this expectation of their wives. In short the image that best represents the current crisis is the stereotypical cartoon scene of a man sitting at: the breakfast table with a newspaper held up in front of his face while a woman glares at the back of it wanting to talk. 1.What is most wives main expectation of their husbands? 2. Judging from the context, the phrase "wreaking havoc"(Line 3, Para. 2)most probably means( ). 3.All of the following are true EXCEPT ( ). 4.Which of the following can best summarize the main idea of this text? 5.In the following part immediately after this text, the author will most probably focus on( ).'>

I was addressing a small gathering in a suburban Virginia living room-a women's group that had invited men to join them. Throughout the evening one man had been particularly talkative frequently offering ideas and anecdotes while his wife sat silently beside him on the couch. Toward the end of the evening I commented that women frequently complain that their husbands don’t talk to them. This man quickly concurred. He gestured toward his wife and said "she's the talker in our family. The room burst into laughter the man looked puzzled and hurt, "it's true" he explained. “When I come home from work I have nothing to say. If she didn't keep the conversation going we'd spend the whole evening in silence.”This episode crystallizes the irony that although American men tend to talk more than women in public situations they often talk less at home, and pattern is wreaking havoc with marriage.The pattern was observed by political scientist Andrew Hacker in the late 70s. Sociologist Catherine Kohler Riessman reports in her new book Divorce Talk’’ at most of the women she interviewed— but only a few of the me— gave lack of communication as the reason for their divorces. Given the current divorce rate of nearly 50 percent that amounts to millions of cases in the United States every year —a virtual epidemic of failed conversation.In my own research complaints from women about their husbands most often focused not

查看答案

相关问题推荐

  • The government has a big role to play in creating laws that protects earth’s natural water resources from total destruction and ( )information to the public with ways and means to conserve water.



    A.dispersing B.annotating C.announcing D.disseminating
    查看答案
  • Glass ( )provide a useful function in sectioning off and enclosing an area when the desired effect is to maintain visual transparency.



    A.separations B.segregations C.partitions D.isolations
    查看答案
  • Teaching children to be ( )in both technology and basic skills like writing by hand is a balancing act that is as much a task for parents as for teachers.



    A.proficient B.adept C.capable D.suitable
    查看答案
  • s="" "piltdown="" man"="" confused="" the="" scientific="" community="" for="" 40="" years="" until="" it="" was="" discovered="" that="" skull="" only="" 500="" old="" rather="" than="" 500,000,="" and="" jawbone="" of="" an="" orangutan.="" in="" other="" instances="" misconduct,="" data="" journals="" has="" been="" inadequately="" documented="" or="" improperly="" reported="" cases="" misconduct="" are="" rare="" but="" important="" because="" publicity="" they="" receive="" once="" discovered,="" eroding="" public's="" trust="" peer-review="" system="" science="" itself.="" to="" keep="" this="" type="" conduct="" check,="" articles="" include="" detailed="" descriptions="" experimental="" protocols="" enable="" others="" reproduce="" experiments. 1.Scientific journals make for reliable reading owing to ( ). 2.Qualified peer reviewers ( ). 3.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true? 4.It can be inferred that scientific journals ( ). 5.Scientific misconduct( ).'>

    Scientific journals can provide reliable information because of the process called "peer review ",in which other scientists(peers) evaluate the value and credibility of research before allowing it to appear in print.Peer-review is performed by knowledgeable scientists who are not directly involved with the research being evaluated. In fact, reviewers are often scientific competitors. To remove any bias from the review process, most manuscripts (articles prior to publication) are considered by three reviewers independently. Reviewers consider the validity of the approach, the significance and originality of the finding, its interest and timeliness to the scientific community, and the clarity of the writing. Reviewers then provide feedback on the manuscript they have read. Journal editors rely on peer-review feedback to guide their publication decisions, and authors use reviewers comments to refine the text of their manuscript and the experiments within. Journal editors must occasionally resolve issues related to conflict of interest among reviewers; reviewers identities are generally not revealed to manuscript authors. This later rule is intended to free reviewers from any social pressures, allowing them to consider only the quality of the science before them.Reviewers are expected to keep the information in a manuscript confidential until it is published, but it is rare that the work comes as a complete surprise to the entire scientific community. This is because peer review is integrated into almost every step of science.Most research scientists request public funding for their experiments. Funding decisions are made by a committee of other scientists who debate each proposal’s likelihood of success, the validity of its approach, and the importance of the question being asked. Once funded, the experiments can begin, and preliminary data is often revealed at scientific meetings. This allows the findings to be debated and defended with colleagues prior to publication. Once the experiments are completed, a manuscript is written and circulated to all those who contributed to the work. Manuscripts commonly undergo several rounds of revision by the authors before being submitted to a journal for peer review, Journals vary in their selectivity and focus. Consequently, manuscripts are first sent to the most widely read journal likely to publish the work. If that journal declines to publish the manuscript, it can be sent to a different journal for consideration.Despite the best efforts of reviewers, cases of scientific misconduct do occur and incorrect or unsubstantiated data does get published. Some cases turn out to be elaborate hoaxes. For example, in 1912 Charles Dawson showed off parts of a skull and jawbone to the public and convinced scientists that the fossils represented the missing link between man and ape Dawson's "Piltdown Man" confused the scientific community for 40 years until it was discovered that the skull was only 500 years old rather tha

    查看答案
  • Which of the following sentences expresses "probability"?



    A.You must leave immediately. B.You must be feeling rather tired. C.You must be here by eight o’clock. D.you must complete reading assignment on time.
    查看答案
  • 教育方针的特点主要包括
    查看答案
  • 全面建设社会主义现代化国家,最艰巨最繁重的任务仍然在()
    查看答案
  • 张三为自己投保意外伤害保险,保额10万,张三确定李四为受益人.如果张三因意外伤害死亡后,赔款10万元应支付给()
    A.
    张三的配偶
    B.
    张三的子女
    C.
    李四
    D.
    张三的父母
    查看答案
  • 设备监理阶段可分为()、安装调试阶段、试运行阶段监理
    查看答案
  • 关于基金风险指标的计算
    查看答案
  • 至人无梦成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章
  • 致之度外成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章
  • 色仁行违成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章
  • 良质美手成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章
  • 臭不可当成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章
  • 舍策追羊成语书写拼音_来源典故及翻译
    查看文章